Skip to Main Content
It looks like you're using Internet Explorer 11 or older. This website works best with modern browsers such as the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. If you continue with this browser, you may see unexpected results.
St George's University of London Logo

Systematic reviews: finding and managing the evidence

This guide gives an overview of how to plan, execute and organize literature searches to support systematic reviews and other projects and research requiring in-depth searches.

What are systematic reviews?

It’s widely acknowledged that health care decisions should be made on the basis of the best available evidence.

However, with a large and growing body of research information out there of variable quality, it can be time-consuming and overwhelming for healthcare staff  and researchers to find that best available evidence.

Systematic reviews help overcome this problem. They aim to: identify, evaluate and summarize the findings of individual studies, in a systematic and unbiased manner, thereby making reliable evidence more accessible to decision makers.

High quality systematic reviews seek to

  • Identify all relevant published and unpublished evidence
  • Select studies or reports for inclusion
  • Assess the quality of each study or report
  • Synthesize the findings from individual studies or reports in an unbiased way
  • Interpret the findings and present a balanced and impartial summary of the findings with due consideration of any flaws in the evidence.

Hemingway, P. (2009) What is a systematic review?

The best websites to find systematic reviews are:

The Cochrane Library

The Campbell Collaboration

Prospero (Prospective trials)